All my plays are a new phone and the reflection regarding nostalgia
“How curious that is usually, the way curious that is usually, ” as they chant in The Bald Soprano, no roots, no foundation, no authenticity, not any, nothing, only unmeaning, and even absolutely no higher power—though this Emperor turns up invisibly inside the Chairs, as from a “marvelous dream :., the paradisiaco gaze, often the noble encounter, the top, the radiance of The Majesty, ” the Old Man's “last recourse” (149–50), as he or she tells, ahead of he entrusts his meaning to the Orator plus throws himself out typically the window, departing us in order to discover that the Orator is deaf and stupid. Thus the delusion of hierarchy and, spoken or perhaps unspoken, the futile counter or vacuity of presentation. But even more inquiring, “what a new coincidence! ” (17) is how this particular vacant datum of typically the Absurd evolved into the ton of deconstruction, which shrubs its bets, however, upon a devastating nothingness by way of letting metaphysics in immediately after presumably rubbing it out, of which is, putting it “under erasure” (sous rature), while Derrida does in the grammatology, conceding what Nietzsche explained to us, that God is definitely dead, but working with the phrase anyhow, mainly because we can hardly think without it, or even additional transcendental signifiers, for instance splendor or eternity—which may be, in fact, the words spoken by means of the Old Man to the invisible Belle inside The Chairs, grieving what exactly they didn't dare, the lost love, “Everything … lost, lost, lost” (133).
There would appear for you to be parody here, plus one might count on that will Ionesco—in a distinctive line of descent from Nietzsche to poststructuralist thought—would not only refuse the older metaphysics however laugh as well from the ridiculousness of just about any nostalgia regarding that, like for the originary moments of a bright beauty rendered with Platonic truth. As well as the Orator who is found dressed as “a normal painter or poet from the nineteenth century” (154) is usually, with his histrionic approach together with conceited air, certainly certainly not Lamartine, that questions “Eternité, néant, passé, sombre abîme” (“Eternity, nothingness, past—dark abyss”) to return often the sublime raptures they include stolen; nor is he or she remotely the figure associated with Keats with his Grecian urn, teasing us away of consideration in equating beauty together with reality. What we have instead, within Amédée or Learn how to get Clear of It, is the hypnotic beauty of the fact that which, when they miss to close the lids, reflects from the eyes, which often never have aged—“Great green vision. Pointing like beacons”—of the particular incurably growing corpse. “We might get along without his or her type of beauty, ” states Madeleine, the sour in addition to bitter wife, “it will take up also much space. ” Nevertheless Amédée will be fascinated by means of the transfiguring growth of their ineluctable presence, which might attended from the abyss of precisely what is lost, lost, misplaced. “He's growing. It's rather natural. He's branching away. ”3 But if discover anything wonderful here, it seems to come—if certainly not from the Romantic interval or one of typically the more memorable futurist photographs, Boccioni's The Body Climbing (Amédée's family name will be Buccinioni)—from another poetic resource: “That corpse you rooted last year in your own garden, [/ hcg diet plan] Has this begun to help sprout? ” It's almost like Ionesco were picking up, actually, Capital t. S. Eliot's issue throughout The Waste Land: “Will it bloom this yr? ”4 If this certainly not only flowers, as well as balloons, but jigs away, having Amédée with the idea, the particular oracle associated with Keats's urn—all you know that is known plus all you need for you to know—seems some sort of far cry from the humorous mordancy of this transcendence, or what in The Chairs, set up Orator had used, might have radiated upon great grandchildren, or from the vision of some sort of corpse, from the light on the Aged Man's mind (157).
Still the truth is of which, intended for Ionesco, the Screaming can be predicated on “the memory of a memory space of a memory” of a actual pastoral, elegance and truth inside nature, if not quite nevertheless in art. Or therefore it appears in “Why Do I Write? A Summing Upwards, ” where this individual subpoena up his childhood on the Mill of typically the Chapelle-Anthenaise, the farm throughout St-Jean-sur-Mayenne, “the state, the particular bar, the hearth. ”5 Whatever it was now there he didn't understand, just like the priest's questions at the first croyance, it had been now there, also, that he was “conscious of being alive. … I actually lived, ” he or she says, “in happiness, joy, figuring out in some way that each moment was initially fullness without knowing this word brings. I been around in a good type of dazzlement. ” Whatever in that case occurred to impair this kind of sparkling time, the dazzle remains in memory, as a thing other than fool's money: “the world had been stunning, and I was alert to it, everything was fresh new and pure. big repeat: it is to discover this splendor again, in one piece in the mud”—which, since a site of the particular Absurd, he shares with Beckett—“that I write literary gets results. All my guides, all my plays are a call, the manifestation of a nostalgia, a visit a treasure buried throughout the underwater, lost within the catastrophe associated with history” (6).